If you have them in your school you can auto matically deny any games or webistes.
That they should not be be on. You are not being disrecpetful. If you are not looking and just ingoring te person thats how i fill. They can be used as a tool. Most schools dont have a computer of some sort so the kids have to write those papers. Yet if you add ipods to the school it cuts back on paper and other materials that are needed for school such a pencils, and ink.
Think do you really want ipods in school.
Ontario’s Classroom Cell Phone Ban
They should be allowed because it used for educational related tasks like, using the calculator or searching up information or taking notes when you forget your notebook or pencil. But I also think that teachers should limit the use of it, like during lessons and only to use during work time. It''s not like the teacher will let students use it during a test! Students will hide the iPod on a test, so why take the chance of having to have a student retake the test. It would also give the kids a grade they don't deserve.
In my opinion ipods,cellphones, and other electric devices should not be banned because you could use these devices for learning. Ipods could be used as calculators. Cellphones also used as calculators and if you can get internet you could search something small and quick up.
Other electronic devices like laptops can be used for reasearch for note taking etc. We are living in the twetny first century, people have to recognize that we are getting more into technology and getting rid of paper and pencil. Electronics are moving there way into our lives and theres nothing we can od to stop it. Using technology in class is definetly a yes.
≡Essays on Cell Phones. Free Examples of Research Paper Topics, Titles GradesFixer
There's so much more you can do when using things like ipods, cellphones and other electronic devices. Yes students will be off task sometimes but they wil still get there work done. Over all I tihnk that elctronic devices should be aloud in schools for educaitonal reasons. In the end, it comes down to the fact that cheating is easier, much more accessible, being distracted, plaiying games is right at the finger tips of the students. Then comes the whole "listening to the music while the techers trying to talk" Then is comes down to money. If you want to eliminate paper and such and have all documents on a laptop or another sort of hand-held device tablet, mp3 player, phone then schools could eliminate books, worksheets ect.
But this means every student needs to have the same device which so that the teacher can provide documents in the same file format.
This also means that every parent or school district needs to dish out so much money for very student to have said electronic device. This would increase "crime rate" in schools! Overall its expensive, allow for kids to cheat, get distracted and learn in less effective way. The idea of it sounds nice, but its not as good as the first glance. Let's assume a large class is taking a test. This class has maybe twenty-five students. The odds that you are able to separate all the students that may possibly be talkative or disruptive is minuscule, but if you allow these students to use an iPod at a low volume they will likely just listen contently.
I have personally seen students get away with it for the simple reason that they draw no attention with their head down listening quietly to their preferred music. Isn't the focus of many school rules to minimize distraction to other class members? No, because students will be distracted Cell phones should not be allowed in schools because if the students get bored, they might use them to play games or do other activities that distract their attention from learning. In case of family emergency, the teachers have a cell phone and the parents could call them.
Yes because Sometimes teachers, parents or students are part of the problem. Everyone involved in the fight was tagged, including the boy who was beaten up. This trend is more common for those teens whose parents are under 40 and low in educational attainment. A number of violent attacks on schoolchildren have been filmed on mobile phones equipped with video cameras.
In one of the most serious incidents a teenager was shot in the leg by two teenagers who photographed her injuries with a mobile phone. Kerry Deville, 17, had surgery to remove the pellet at Leeds General Infirmary after the incident in Wortley. Kids will be raped,bullied and harassed with or without cell phones. At least with cellphone evidence the police or ultimately the law can't shrug the incident off.
A camera phone is the perfect mechanism by which young people aim to derive their 60 minutes of fame. The first newspaper article to use the phrase "happy slapping" was "Bullies film fights by phone", published in The Times Educational Supplement on 21 January , in which reporter Michael Shaw described teachers' accounts of the craze in London schools. The Phrase Finder describes the phenomenon thus: Meaning: Unprovoked attacks on individuals made in order to record the event, and especially the victim's shock and surprise, on video phones. Origin: Happy slapping Children or passers by are slapped or otherwise mugged by one or more of a gang while others record the event on video and then distribute it by phone or Internet.
Initially the attacks were, as the phrase would have us believe, fairly minor pranks As the craze spread the attacks became more vicious — often serious assaults known in legal circles as grievous bodily harm. Footage of the attack was circulated on students' phones. Authorities were alerted when school staff saw footage from the students' phones. Barry Lee, 20, and another year-old were cleared of all charges. According to press reports, "The year-old girl had told Morley that she was making a documentary about 'happy slapping' before her gang of friends kicked him to death.
Two plain clothes police officers saw the incident, and the assailants were immediately arrested and the mobile phone confiscated.
The killing was filmed and distributed online. Caine Hallett, 18, was sentenced to five years for manslaughter for the same incident, while Danielle Reeves, 18, faced a retrial in May for manslaughter. Two of the youths were hospitalised by the intended victim and four were arrested for causing an affray. He is reported to have yelled "This is YouTube material!
The judge stated that the courts had to make an example of such youths. Instead of taking away phones, using the premise that bullies are attention seekers; wouldn't it be more sensible to figure why they crave attention or why their willing to use extreme violence to promote themselves? From fights over a girl at the gate, underage sex, rape, teen pregnancies to Latrine humiliations, none of this is new.
Why cell phones should be allowed in schools.
All of these things have been reported in books, journals, articles, movies and T. V programs dated from before everyone over 13 had a cell phone. To blame cellphones for this , is rubbish. It is the least effective and most ignorant way to handle this. Pretending there isn't a problem, won't do away with it. No, the schools have phones, the students can use those.
Need Writing Help?
The students at school bring their phones in case of an "emergency". But realistically the only serious emergencies that are happening at school are forgetting your gym clothes or lunch one day. In my school perticularly, an elementary school, you shouldn't need a cellphone, there is a phone in every classroom, as long as you ask the teacher, they'll probably let you use it, but with a personal cell phone, students can always get distracted and be tempted to use them during class.
They would get really mad at you. The other bad thing about bringing your cellphone to school is that someone might steal it and not give it back to you. They also might call random people and talk to them. If your cell phone has an annoying ring tone it might ring in class and the teacher might take it and not give it back to you.
Should the Cell Phones Be Allowed in Schools
There are so many things that can go wrong so i think that cellphones should not be allowed in school. If there is an emergency then you can use the office phone or use your friends. KA Yes because Even non smart phones can be used to text answers. Should people be allowed to sell their own organs? A way to discourage students from trying their luck is to threaten to confiscate phones for a long period of time.
Students will hopefully think about the huge consequences and allow their teachers to hold onto their cell phone during the test period. Which leads them to fail in the exams. But that has a downside for students may carry an extra cell phone with them or even use calculators which may not be allowed for the tests and yet they resort to cheat even if the teacher confiscates all the phones under his or her watch their can be a big problem where by a phone gets lost and the teacher will be held responsible.
- Why cell phones should be allowed in schools. - GCSE English - Marked by leygasttriparmam.tk.
- informative essay about drug addiction.
- Learn more;
- case studies in nursing ethics • 4th 11;
There are also many websites which are inappropriate to watch for students whose duty is to study. They get addicted to games. This causes less memory abilities.